Comparative Analysis of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) in Terms of Theır Counterterrorism Doctrines, Organizational Structures and Practices

Article

Since the September 11 attacks, counter-terrorism (CT) has gained prominence and become a central issue throughout the world. Given the growing transnational character of terrorism, counter-measures also entailed a collective nature. At this point, the role of global and regional organizations to bring the efforts of the individual countries into a meaningful action become much more important. ...

Giray SADIK
Assoc. Prof. Dr., Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Turkey

Aybike YALÇIN İSPİR
Ph. D.Candidate, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Turkey

ABSTRACT

Since the September 11 attacks, counter-terrorism (CT) has gained prominence and become a central issue throughout the world. Given the growing transnational character of terrorism, counter-measures also entailed a collective nature. At this point, the role of global and regional organizations to bring the efforts of the individual countries into a meaningful action become much more important. In this regard, this article will comparatively analyze North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) in terms of their counter-terrorism doctrines, organizational structures and practices between 2001-2019.

These international organizations have been specifically chosen by taking their counter-terrorism histories and member compositions into consideration. While NATO is often called as a transatlantic military alliance and SCO as a Eurasian security, political and economic organization; there is an evident ef fort for combating terrorism in the framework of these institutions for several years.

In this context, this article aims at addressing the question that to what extent these organizations respond to global terrorism legally, structurally and functionally. Furthermore, it is also questioned that whether these two security clusters can cooperate in countering terrorism. In addition, as a general question, whether these organizations contribute to military competition by masking it in the form of counter-terrorism will be asked.

Preliminary findings suggest that Transatlantic and Eurasian security structures are very much interrelated and that is why NATO and SCO’s cooperation in combating terrorism will bring fruitful results for the regional security and stability. Moreover, the early findings indicate that counter-terrorism policies of these organizations have been reflecting as much geopolitical rivalry as their genuine security concerns.

Key Words: Counter-terrorism (CT), North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure (RATS), regional security


1. INTRODUCTION

Terrorism is a complex threat for both national and international security. Although the history of terrorism goes back, developments in communication, transportation and weaponry have resulted in unprecedented scale of violence. However, terrorism has become a more central issue for international organizations especially after the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States (US).

While terrorism is evolving into a more trans-national nature, countries cooperate under global and regional international organizations because it is obvious that a more coordinated response is needed if a real solution is being sought. As a result, several international organizations have put counter-terrorism to their agenda as one of their security priorities. In this context, this article specifically deals with two large regional security organizations which are North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)in terms of their counter-terrorism doctrines, organizational structures and operations.

NATO and SCO have been selected as the cases for the article for purpose. First of all, as it is indicated inFigure 1, Transatlantic and Eurasian security systems are very much interrelated when main organizations and networks dealing with security in these regions are taken into consideration. However, interestingly, they do not have official dialoguing combating terrorism in the region. Although NATO and SCO have cooperation clauses in their official documents, there is a tendency to communicate and act jointly with traditional partners such as United Nations (UN), Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and European Union (EU) for NATO and UN, OSCE, Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) for SCO.

It is taken from TASAM Publishing's book named “New World Architecture Of Economy and Security“
This content is protected by Copyright under the Trademark Certificate. It may be partially quoted, provided that the source is cited, its link is given and the name and title of the editor/author (if any) is mentioned exactly the same. When these conditions are fulfilled, there is no need for additional permission. However, if the content is to be used entirely, it is absolutely necessary to obtain written permission from TASAM.

Areas

Continents ( 5 Fields )
Action
 Contents ( 455 ) Actiivities ( 218 )
Areas
Africa 0 144
Asia 0 231
Europe 0 38
Latin America & Carribean 0 34
North America 0 8
Regions ( 4 Fields )
Action
 Contents ( 173 ) Actiivities ( 52 )
Areas
Balkans 0 93
Middle East 0 59
Black Sea and Caucasus 0 16
Mediterranean 0 5
Identity Fields ( 2 Fields )
Action
 Contents ( 175 ) Actiivities ( 74 )
Areas
Islamic World 0 146
Turkish World 0 29
Turkey ( 1 Fields )
Action
 Contents ( 219 ) Actiivities ( 57 )
Areas
Turkey 0 219

RF's National Security Strategy is the basic strategic planning document that includes the goals and objectives for ensuring the national interests, strategic priorities, national security and long-term sustainable development of the RF. The National Security Strategy is the most important strategi...;

BRAINS2 TÜRKİYE is a brand/initiative with multi-programs based in Turkey which develops market, ecosystem and capacity in the ‘Biotechnology’, ‘Robotics’, ‘Artificial Intelligence’, ‘Nanotechnology’, ‘Space’ and ‘Strategic Services’ fields. The programs planned through identical visions and strateg...;

'Russia Is Not Angry; It's focusing.' This is a Russian aphorism put forward by Alexander Gorchakov, the Foreign Minister of the Russian empire, in 1856, after Russia lowered its international profile following its defeat in the Crimean War. Indeed, Russia is a country that has had its ups and dow...;

After the Industrial Revolution, with the development of production, trade, logistics and markets, it is seen that Britain in the 19th century and the United States later in the 20th century owed their control over world trade to navy.;

The rapid development of information technologies has brought security problems of the same magnitude. In the early years of the Internet, "accessibility" came to the fore among the three important components of information security, "accessibility, confidentiality, and integrity"; First, the develo...;

Transforming the relations between Turkey and Middle East (or in a narrower context between Turkey and the Gulf States - where strategic dialogue is still developing despite its strong historical and cultural background) from a fragile axis to a cooperation axis that will adapt to new balances, new ...;

The geopolitical panorama created by the similarities of African countries as well as their differences provides crucial data both for their integration and for their potential for conflict. Both intra-continental and international defence and security strategies need to be determined in a way that ...;

The international institutions and the understanding of security created after World War II for global balance and control become unable to respond to the security needs of our age. The deepening of the last wave of globalization that started in the 1980s brought with it unprecedented alignments and...;

Istanbul Cyber-Security Forum

The rapid development of information technologies has brought security problems of the same magnitude. In the early years of the Internet, "accessibility" came to the fore among the three important components of information security, "accessibility, confidentiality, and integrity"; First, the development and operation of the Internet were considered, and "confidentiality and integrity" remained in the background.

  • 03 Nov 2022 - 04 Nov 2022
  • DTB Hilton Istanbul Topkapi Hotel -
  • İstanbul - Turkey

6th Turkey - Gulf Defence And Securıty Forum

  • 03 Nov 2022 - 04 Nov 2022
  • Harbiye Military Museum and Cultural Site -
  • İstanbul - Türkiye

5th Turkey - Afrıca Defence Securıty And Aerospace Forum

  • 03 Nov 2022 - 04 Nov 2022
  • Harbiye Military Museum and Cultural Site -
  • İstanbul - Türkiye

4th Marıne And Marıtıme Securıty Forum 2022

  • 03 Nov 2022 - 04 Nov 2022
  • Harbiye Askerî Müzesi ve Kültür Sitesi -
  • İstanbul - Türkiye

8th Istanbul Security Conference (2022)

  • 03 Nov 2022 - 04 Nov 2022
  • Harbiye Military Museum and Cultural Site -
  • İstanbul - Turkey

World Turkic Forum Wise Persons Board Meeting 5

  • 14 Jun 2023 - 14 Jun 2023
  • İstanbul - Türkiye